5G Technology
5G, the latest wireless infrastructure revolution for next-generation smartphones, is imminent. And with it, the safety risk of this new, more efficient network is at stake. How preoccupied are you with the coming 5 G health apocalypse? By now, you may have seen Facebook posts or alternative health websites. The gist: 5 G is a risky expansion in conventional wireless technology, one filled with higher-energy radiation that could have adverse effects on people. Some 5 G conspiracy theories claim that the new network is creating radiofrequency radiation that can destroy DNA and contribute to cancer; causing oxidative harm that can trigger premature aging; disrupting cell metabolism, and possibly contributing to other diseases through developing stress proteins. Some papers by dissertation writing services firms cite reports and views from respected organizations, such as the World Health Organization.

What Exactly Is 5G?
5 G has been hyped for many years, but this is the year that operators start rolling out the new wireless standard. In the first half of the year, AT&T, Verizon, and Sprint have all begun expanding their networks, while widespread coverage is still a year or more away. This year 5 G would gain a foothold in just over a handful of cities. With the advent of the Coronavirus pandemic, several conspiracy theories on viral social media have suggested that 5 G is the cause of the world's current problems. These statements are, to put it plainly, factually inaccurate. 5G Causes no Coronavirus. That's not stopping makers of equipment and service providers from jumping on the 5 G bandwagon. For e.g, Samsung's latest Galaxy S10 and Galaxy Fold (the phone unfurling into a tablet) are both 5G-ready, along with LG, Huawei, Motorola, ZTE, and more versions.

How Dangerous Is Radiofrequency Radiation To Health?
Radiofrequency radiation (RFR) is at the root of all questions about cellular networks. RFR is something released in the electromagnetic spectrum, from microwaves and x-rays and radio waves to sunlight or illumination from your computer. RFR is not necessarily risky, but the question is to discover under what conditions it might be. Scientists believe the most relevant criterion as to whether any particular RFR is harmful is whether it falls into the ionizing or non-ionizing radiation range. To put it plainly, any non-ionizing radiation is too weak to break chemical bonds. It includes ultraviolet, visible light, infrared, and everything at lower frequencies, including radio waves.

Everyday devices such as power lines, FM radio, and Wi-Fi fall under this spectrum as well. (Microwaves are the only exception: non-ionizing, but capable of destroying tissue, they are reliably and purposefully calibrated to interact with water molecules.) UV frequencies above, such as x-rays and gamma rays, are ionized. It's misleading to use the word radiation because people think of nuclear weapons, they think of ionizing radiation that can cause harm. This may kill cells. It can cause mutations of DNA. However, because non-ionizing radiation does not cause damage to DNA or tissue, the mobile phone RFR's most concern is misguided. Many sources of non-ionizing radiation have no known mechanism to even have a biological effect.

Heating Dangers:
Part of the 5 G spectrum permitted under international guidelines is within the microwave band. The microwaves produce heat in objects they move through. However, the heating effects are not dangerous at the rates used for 5 G (and earlier mobile technologies), says report, of the International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Safety (ICNIRP). The average radio frequency level to which anyone in the group may be exposed from 5 G (or any other signals in general population areas) is so low that there has been no temperature increase to date that may be somehow dangerous for working moms.

The Bottom Line:
Certainly, there is research that correlates exposure to RF-EMF with a significant rise in the risk of developing certain cancers and other adverse health outcomes. But the jury is still out on how serious a threat to our safety is posed by RF-EMFs in general-and 5 G bandwidths in particular. There's no relief from the countless radio waves zipping through the air all around us for those of us who live in heavily populated regions. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends reducing our sensitivity to RF-EMFs by minimizing how much time we spend on our mobile phones, as well as using speaker mode or a hands-free kit to build greater space between our devices and our ears. Only time will tell the truth about the relation of 5G technology and health hazards.